4.7 Article

Facile synthesis and characterization of multifunctional cobalt-based nanocomposites for targeted chemo-photothermal synergistic cancer therapy

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107521

关键词

Metal-matrix composites (MMCs); Photothermal; Nano-structures; Surface properties; Magnetic properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81801848]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2017FZ0046, 2018JZ0026, 2019YJ0554]
  3. International Science and Technology Center Funding of Chengdu [2017-GH02-00025-HZ]
  4. Deyang Science and Technology Program [19YXKJ0009]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering [sklpme2019-2-05]
  6. Hong Kong Scholar Program
  7. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we develop polyethylene glycol (PEG) modified nanocomposites, which structurally constitute graphene oxide (GO) and cobalt nanoparticles (CoNPs), called as the CoNPs-GO-PEG nanocomposites. These CoNPs-GO-PEG nanocomposites show better outcomes and less side effects when eliminating tumor cells. After a series of comprehensive characterizations, the CoNPs-GO-PEG nanocomposites are proved to possess pleasing targeting ability and unique drug release behavior, indicating that the concentration of the drug delivered by CoNPs-GO-PEG in the tumor site is much higher than that in the normal tissue, and concerning the favorable biocompatibility of CoNPs-GO-PEG nanocomposites, less harm is caused to normal tissue compared to traditional chemotherapy. Furthermore, because of the satisfactory photothermal effect and favorable drug release behavior of the material, the CoNPs-GO-PEG are able to eradicate most of the tumor cells (99%) through synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy in vitro. So far, our study has demonstrated an inspiring potential for the CoNPs-GO-PEG nanocomposites to act as a favorable targeting multifunctional agent in cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据