4.7 Article

Structural integrity assessment on cracked composites interaction with aeroelastic constraint by means of XFEM

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111414

关键词

Aeroelastic; Crack; Composite structure; Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM); Fourier Series Function (SFS); Gust

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (MOHE)
  2. International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)
  3. Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP)
  4. National Institute of Aeronautics & Space of Indonesia (LAPAN)
  5. Indonesian Aerospace (IAe)
  6. Agency for Assessment & Application of Technology of Indonesia (BPPT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel approach in assessing the structural integrity of cracked composite plates under the aeroelastic condition by using XFEM is presented. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first time that aeroelastic condition is coupled in XFEM to model the crack propagations. Previous researches from the literature had only considered a static crack condition. This research focuses on determining the first failure experienced by the cracked composite plate, either the crack will propagate causing a fracture, or the composite plate will fail due to aeroelastic instability imposed at the critical flutter speed. The proposed scheme is used to solve the limitation in XFEM within Abaqus that only general static and implicit dynamic analysis can be performed. The structure is assumed to interact with minimal gust, and the deflections by time are expressed in the equation of periodic motion based on Fourier Series Function (FSF). The results show that at a particular fibre orientation, once the damaged composite plate is deformed due to the dynamics load at dive speed, it fails due to the crack propagation first instead of the flutter. In contrast, another fibre configuration shows good resistance to crack propagation and fails due to flutter instability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据