4.3 Article

Numerical evaluation on the influence of void defects and interphase on the thermal expansion coefficients of three-dimensional woven carbon/carbon composites

期刊

COMPOSITE INTERFACES
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 873-892

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09276440.2019.1707586

关键词

Woven carbon; carbon composites; Coefficient of thermal expansion; Void defects; Multi-scale modeling; interphase elastic modulus

资金

  1. National Security Basic Research Program of China [61391]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to evaluate the influence of void defects and interphase on the thermal expansion properties of three-dimensional woven carbon/carbon composites, a multi-scale numerical model was proposed to predict the effective thermal expansion coefficients considering void defects and interphase. On micro-scale, the effective thermal expansion coefficients of fiber bundles with void defects were predicted. On meso-scale, the effective thermal expansion coefficients of three-dimensional woven carbon/carbon composite with voids and interphase were predicted through a two-step homogenization procedure based on the asymptotic homogenization method and finite element method. The numerical model was validated by comparing with experimental measurements. Moreover, the influences of voids fraction and interphase modulus on the effective thermal expansion coefficients were examined quantitatively. The results indicate that the voids fraction has a negative impact on the coefficients of thermal expansion. The thermal expansion coefficients tend to decrease approximately linearly with the increase of voids fraction in fiber reinforcement and matrix, and decrease nonlinearly with the increase of voids fraction in interphase. The effective coefficients of thermal expansion increase as the increase of interphase elastic modulus, and the influence of interphase voids fraction on the coefficients of thermal expansion is becoming weaken as the increase of interphase elastic modulus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据