4.7 Article

Reactive sites on the surface of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon clusters: A numerical study

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 362-373

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.09.034

关键词

HACA; MD; Parameter alpha; Solvent-excluded surface; PAH

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806016]
  2. Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars
  3. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under the project UK Consortium on Mesoscale Engineering Sciences (UK-COMES) [EP/R029598/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surface growth of soot is a key process in its mass growth, depending crucially on surface properties. In this work, we directly extract the detailed surface properties, such as surface area, number density of reactive sites on a particle and parameter a, from the microscopic configuration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) clusters. Five representative PAHs, including pyrene (C16H10), coronene (C24H12), ovalene (C32H14), hexabenzocoronene (C42H18) and circumcoronene (C54H18), are used to build the model configurations of nascent soot. We develop a numerical scheme to determine the detailed surface properties based on the approximation of solvent-excluded surface. The assumption of spherical particles is found to introduce a large uncertainty in the estimation of the surface area, and the error can be a factor of 2.5 in the worst case. The number density of atoms or sites on cluster surfaces does not depend on the chemical composition of a particle larger than 2 nm in diameter, and our study indicates that the number density of hydrogen atoms is overestimated by a factor of 3 in the literature. Finally, we propose a new equation for parameter a, which includes the effects of the size of gaseous species in surface reaction, local temperature, particle size and chemical composition. (C) 2019 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据