4.6 Article

Conductive multilayer film based on composite materials made of conjugated polyelectrolytes and inorganic particles

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124290

关键词

PEDOT:PSS; Multilayer; Conjugated polyelectrolyte; Polythiophene; Inorganic colloidal particle; Conductivity; Composite film

资金

  1. Conseil Regional de Bourgogne Franche-Comte
  2. French RENATECH network
  3. FEMTO-ST technological facility
  4. CNRS
  5. University of Montpellier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) conjugated polymer blend and a cationic poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT)-based conjugated polyelectrolyte incorporating imidazolium ionic side groups were first adsorbed as monolayer on inorganic colloidal particles. At the plateau of adsorption isotherm, adsorbed amount of PEDOT:PSS on alumina particles appears lower than the adsorbed amount of P3HT on silica particles. Both polyelectrolytes strongly modify the surface charge of particles as reveals by zeta potential variation. Functionalized particles were then assembled using Layer-by-Layer method in order to prepare (PDDA/Al2O3-PEDOT:PSS) n and (SiO2-P3HT/PEDOT:PSS) n conductive multilayer film. Thicker PDDA/Al2O3-PEDOT:PSS films were elaborated when a drying step was added during the LbL build-up. The same effect was observed when composite particle concentration was increased from 1 to 10 g.L-1. Electrical behavior of film was completely modified in comparison with PDDA/PEDOT:PSS assembly. After heating at 150 degrees C, no conductivity was detected due to microcracks visible on SEM images. For SiO2-P3HT/PEDOT:PSS assembly, thickness is higher than for PDDA/Al(2)O3-PEDOT:PSS assembly using the same experimental procedure. However, even if two conductive polyelectrolytes were embedded into the film, conductivity was too low at 30 degrees C to be measured by van der Pauw technique probably due to the cracking of the film induced by incorporation of silica particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据