4.7 Article

Evidence-based medical nutrition - A difficult journey, but worth the effort!

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 39, 期 10, 页码 3014-3018

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.01.023

关键词

Malnutrition; Medical nutrition; Nutrition therapy; Evidence-based medicine

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PP00P3_150531, PP00P3_176972]
  2. Research Council of the Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland [1410.000.058, 1410.000.044]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P3_176972] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence-based medicine is the art of combining best external evidence, clinical judgement and patient values for improved daily clinical decision making and is the ultimate goal in modern medicine. Historically, in the field of medical nutrition, there had been a lack of strong evidence from large and high-quality trials resulting in often weak guideline recommendations and therefore insufficient implementation in clinical practice. Particularly in the field of malnutrition, the medical community has long struggled to find evidence-based approaches for effective management by means of screening, assessment and treatment of patients. With recent trials showing that individual medical nutrition therapy has strong effects on clinical outcomes, we should now aim to practice evidence-based medical nutrition (EBMN) by combining clinical judgement (e.g., thorough clinical assessment of the malnourished patient), patient preferences (e.g., integration of perspectives of patients and relatives, consideration of comorbidities to define specific energy/protein goals and appropriate route of medical nutrition therapy) and the most current scientific evidence (e.g., trial-supported use of nutritional interventions for individual patients). Such an approach may certainly be helpful to improve clinical outcomes of the vulnerable population of malnourished medical inpatients. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据