4.3 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure: The effect of body mass index and body composition

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105597

关键词

Intracranial pressure; Cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure; BODPOD; Body mass index; Percentage body fat

资金

  1. MRC [G0501747] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is strongly related to obesity. The relationship between intracranial pressure, body mass index (BMI), percentage body fat and distribution of body fat in non-IIH patients remains less clear. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between intracranial pressure and body type in non-IIH patients. Patients and Methods: Lumbar puncture manometry was used to measure cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure (CSFOP). BMI, in addition to neck, waist and hip circumferences were calculated. Air displacement plethysmography (BODPOD) was used to assess body composition. Results: Data was collected from 100 subjects. 11 subjects with conditions known to cause raised intracranial pressure were excluded from analysis. According to Pearson correlation factors displaying a significant relationship with CSFOP included: BMI (R = 0.635, p < 0.0001); waist circumference (R = 0.498, p < 0.0001), hip circumference (R = 0.513, p < 0.0001) and percentage body fat (R = 0.435, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that BMI was the only independent factor which predicted CSFOP. Sub-analysis according to gender indicated that BMI was predictive in females and percentage body fat was predictive in males. We did not identify any differences in BMI, percentage body fat or distribution of body fat in 7 IIH patients and 7 wtmatched non-IIH patients. Conclusion: BMI and percentage body fat both positively correlated with CSFOp, but BMI was more predictive in women and percentage body fat was more predictive in men. We did not find a relationship between distribution of body fat and CSFOP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据