4.4 Article

On the Formation Mechanisms of Artificially Generated High Reynolds Number Turbulent Boundary Layers

期刊

BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY
卷 160, 期 2, 页码 201-224

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-016-0139-8

关键词

Boundary-layer generation; Formation mechanisms; High Reynolds number; Hot-wire anemometry; Wind tunnel

资金

  1. European Union FP7 Marie Curie MULTISOLVE project [317269]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the evolution of an artificially thick turbulent boundary layer generated by two families of small obstacles (divided into uniform and non-uniform wall normal distributions of blockage). One- and two-point velocity measurements using constant temperature anemometry show that the canonical behaviour of a boundary layer is recovered after an adaptation region downstream of the trips presenting higher momentum thickness (or equivalently, Reynolds number) than the natural case for the same downstream distance (m). The effect of the degree of immersion of the trips for is shown to play a secondary role. The one-point diagnostic quantities used to assess the degree of recovery of the canonical properties are the friction coefficient (representative of the inner motions), the shape factor and wake parameter (representative of the wake regions); they provide a severe test to be applied to artificially generated boundary layers. Simultaneous two-point velocity measurements of both spanwise and wall-normal correlations and the modulation of inner velocity by the outer structures show that there are two different formation mechanisms for the boundary layer. The trips with high aspect ratio and uniform distributed blockage leave the inner motions of the boundary layer relatively undisturbed, which subsequently drive the mixing of the obstacles' wake with the wall-bounded flow (wall-driven). In contrast, the low aspect-ratio trips with non-uniform blockage destroy the inner structures, which are then re-formed further downstream under the influence of the wake of the trips (wake-driven).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据