4.5 Article

Accelerated methane storage in clathrate hydrates using surfactant-stabilized suspension with graphite nanoparticles

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 1112-1119

出版社

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2019.12.009

关键词

methane storage; clathrate hydrates; formation kinetics; suspension; graphite nanoparticles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51606125, 51802190, 21978171, 51876130, 51674240]
  2. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [13ZZ117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, enhanced kinetics of methane hydrate formation in the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution with different concentrations of suspended graphite nanoparticles (GNPs) were investigated at 6.1-9.0 MPa and 274.15 K. The GNPs with rough surfaces and excellent thermal conductivity not only provided a considerable number of microsites for hydrate nucleation but also facilitated the fast hydrate heat transfer in the suspension system. At a relatively low pressure of 6.1 MPa, the suspension with 0.4 wt% of GNPs exhibited the minimum induction time of 22 min and maximum methane uptake of 126.1 cm(3).cm(-3). However, the methane storage performances of the suspensions with higher and lower concentrations of GNPs were not satisfactory. At the applied pressure, the temperature increase arising from the hydrate heat in the suspension system with the optimized concentration (0.4 wt%) of GNPs was more significant than that in the traditional SDS solution. Furthermore, compared with those of the system without GNPs, enhanced hydration rate and storage capacity were achieved in the suspensions with GNPs, and the storage capacities were increased by 3.9%-17.0%. The promotion effect of GNPs on gas hydrate formation at low pressure is much more obvious than that at high pressure. (C) 2019 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据