4.8 Article

Superhydrophilic and Oleophobic Porous Architectures Based on Basalt Fibers as Oil-Repellent Photothermal Materials for Solar Steam Generation

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 493-500

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201902775

关键词

basalt fiber; oil-repellent; oleophobic; photothermal materials; solar steam

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21966028, 21975113]
  2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talent Project of Lanzhou [2018-RC-81]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in Northwest Minzu University [31920190013, 31920190014, 31920190052, 31920180126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The construction of efficient solar steam generation systems is of great importance for a range of purposes, such as desalination, distillation, and sterilization. In this study, superhydrophilic and oleophobic porous architectures are prepared by carbonization of a mixture of basalt fibers and tissue paper (BFT) followed by an oleophobic modification (O-BFT) to form oil-repellent photothermal materials for efficient solar steam generation. The as-prepared O-BFT shows high porosity, superior light absorption, and good thermal insulation (thermal conductivity=0.371 Wm(-1) K-1). Correspondingly, a high solar energy conversion efficiency of 90 % is achieved with 1 sun irradiation. Its strong oleophobic wettability endows it with excellent oil-repellent ability. Therefore, a high energy conversion efficiency of 81 % in oily water was obtained with 1 sun irradiation, whereas the unmodified BFT only shows a low energy conversion efficiency of 26 % because of severe oil contamination, which significantly blocks water evaporation. These unique features of O-BFT makes enable efficient solar steam generation even in oily wastewater, showing great advantages over reported photothermal materials that display poor antifouling performance, which in turn largely extends its application range for practical solar steam generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据