4.8 Article

Improved Photoreduction of CO2 with Water by Tuning the Valence Band of Covalent Organic Frameworks

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 2973-2980

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202000103

关键词

CO2 reduction; covalent organic frameworks; photocatalytic reduction; porphyrin; valence band

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018LB019]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978158]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous covalent organic frameworks (COFs), as an emerging material, have the characteristics of high stability, large series of components, easy synthesis, modification, and adjustable amplitude. They have the potential to become good catalysts. Bromine, as a halogen, has attracted intensive interest for the modification of photocatalysts for photocatalytic reactions. It is feasible to enhance the activity and selectivity of the material by facile functionalization of the reticular parent structure ' s electron-withdrawing groups. In addition, the conjugation effect of bromine, further delocalizing the electrons of the COF, is beneficial to the progress of many photocatalytic reactions. Reports on the modification of COFs by bromine functional groups to improve the catalytic performance have not been found so far. Here, TAPP [5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-aminophenyl)porphyrin] and 2,5-dibromo-1,4-benzenedialdehyde instead of terephthalaldehyde were chosen to synthesize a porphyrin-based COF (TAPBB-COF) by the solvothermal method. As expected, the valence band (VB) of TAPBB-COF is thus adjusted to a more suitable position. Additionally, the CO production when using TAPBB-COF under full-wavelength light for 12 h was 295.2 mu mol g(-1), which was three times that of COF-366, and the new material has good recycling stability and selectivity (95.6 %). Theoretical calculations indicate that the nitrogen of the porphyrin ring and the Schiff base, and the bromine in TAPBB-COF contribute greatly to the activation of H2O and the conversion of CO2 in the photoreaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据