4.7 Article

Characterization of Cd2+ biosorption by Pseudomonas sp. strain 375, a novel biosorbent isolated from soil polluted with heavy metals in Southern China

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124893

关键词

Cadmium; Adsorption; Pseudomonas; Biosorbent

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0605001, 2016YFD0800206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water pollution with heavy metals is a global problem. Using microbial adsorbents to remediate water bodies contaminated with heavy metals has been garnering considerable attention. In this study, a cadmium (Cd2+)-resistant bacterium, isolated from soil polluted with heavy metals, was characterized as Pseudomonas sp. 375 based on its biochemical characteristics and 16S rRNA gene. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Cd2+ for strain 375 was 6 mM. We evaluated the effects of different parameters, such as initial pH, contact time, and initial Cd2+ concentration, on Cd2+ uptake. The data acquired using nonliving biomass were fitted to a Langmuir isotherm model; however, the Freundlich isotherm model showed better fit for data acquired using living biomass. The maximum biosorption capacities were 92.59 mg g(-1) and 63.29 mg g(-1) for living and nonliving cells, respectively. The kinetics of biosorption was described using a pseudo-second order kinetic model. The tightly bound Cd on the cell wall played a major role in Cd2+ adsorption for both biosorbents. SEM-EDX analysis also showed that Cd2+ was bound to the cell wall. FTIR spectral analysis showed that -CH2, -OH, -SO3, C=O, N-H, C-N, phosphate, or sulfate functional groups were the main functional sites for the binding of Cd2+ ions. Effectively Cd2+ removal from Cd2+ contaminated water suggested Pseudomonas sp. 375 was an (a) inexpensive, effective, and promising biosorbent that can be used for bioremediation Cd2+-contaminated wastewater. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据