4.7 Article

The weakest link: Haploid honey bees are more susceptible to neonicotinoid insecticides

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125145

关键词

Apis mellifera; Xenobiotics; Fluctuating asymmetry; Wing venation; Haplodiploidy; Sublethal

资金

  1. Bundesamt fur Umwelt (BAFU)
  2. Vinetum Foundation
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [31003A_169751]
  4. Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research Pollinator Health Fund [549003]
  5. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Multi-state Hatch project [1014681]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_169751] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neonicotinoid insecticides are currently of major concern for the health of wild and managed insects that provide key ecosystem services like pollination. Even though sublethal effects of neonicotinoids are well known, there is surprisingly little information on how they possibly impact developmental stability, and to what extent genetics are involved. This holds especially true for haploid individuals because they are hemizygous at detoxification loci and may be more susceptible. Here we take advantage of haplodiploidy in Western honey bees, Apis mellifera, to show for the first time that neonicotinoids affect developmental stability in diploid females (workers), and that haploid males (drones) are even more susceptible. Phenotypic fore wing venation abnormalities and fluctuating wing asymmetry, as measures of developmental instability, were significantly increased under field-realistic neonicotinoid-exposure of colonies. The higher susceptibility of haploid drones suggests that heterozygosity can play a key role in the ability to buffer the sublethal effects of neonicotinoids. Aiming to improve conservation efforts, our findings highlight the urgent need to better understand the role that genetics plays at enabling nontarget organisms to cope with insecticide exposure. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据