4.7 Article

Health risk assessment of heavy metals and pesticides: A case study in,the main drinking water source in Dalian, China

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125113

关键词

Heavy metal; Pesticide; Carcinogenic risk; Drinking water source; Health risk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Health risk associated with drinking water has attracted increasing attention worldwide. Here, we conducted a survey on the main drinking water sources of Dalian in China to clarify the local human health risk associated with heavy metal and pesticide contaminants in the drinking water sources. The results showed that six heavy metals, namely, copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg), and two pesticides (atrazine and acetochlor) were detected in water samples, where the highest concentration of Hg (0.0621 mu g L-1) exceeded the domestic standard only. In addition to the above-mentioned metals, Cr was also detected in the sediment/soil samples. As to the pesticides, atrazine, acetochlor, hexachlorobenzene, p,p'-DDE, and p,p'-DDD were detected in the sediment/soil samples at ng g(-1) levels, and atrazine and acetochlor were found in water samples at ng L-1 levels. The human health risk assessment showed no marked difference in carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks from drinking water. Our study approved that hexachlorobenzene and arsenic were the main contributors to human carcinogenic risks, which were calculated at the level of 10(-4). Furthermore, sediment and soil ingestion was considered as the major source of human health risk in our study area. This study revealed the current pollution status in the surrounding area of the drinking water source and the main source associated with human health risk, which established a sound basis for further decision-making to take necessary action on pollution control. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据