4.5 Article

A phase II, single-arm, prospective study of bendamustine plus melphalan conditioning for second autologous stem cell transplantation in de novo multiple myeloma patients through a tandem transplant strategy

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 51, 期 9, 页码 1197-1203

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2016.94

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mundipharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This phase II trial evaluates, for the first time, the safety and efficacy of bendamustine plus high-dose melphalan (HDM) as a conditioning regimen before the second autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) patients. In total, 32 ASCT patients received HDM (200 mg/m(2)) as conditioning for the first ASCT. After 3-6 months from the first ASCT, responding patients underwent a second ASCT following bendamustine (200 mg/m(2)) and HDM (140 mg/m(2)). High-dose chemotherapy and ASCT were performed with complete neutrophil and platelet recovery in all patients. The median number of days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11 (range 9-15) and 12 (range 10-19), respectively. Only one subject experienced grade 3 diarrhea; the rate of mucositis and vomiting was significantly lower with the bendamustine plus HDM regimen compared with the HDM-only regimen (81.2 vs 96.9%, P = 0.025 and 78.1 vs 100%, P = 0.008). Overall response rate (ORR) was 81.2% after the first transplant, and 90.6% after the second, while complete response rates were 46.8 and 62.5%, respectively (P = 0.016). Actuarial 2-year PFS and OS were 79% (95% confidence interval (CI), 60-98) and 97% (95% CI, 91-100), respectively. Bendamustine+HDM is feasible as the conditioning regimen for second ASCT in MM patients. The present study may pave the way for phase III studies specifically aimed at further investigating this combination strategy. The role of this combination in MM for conditioning regimen in a first or single ASCT setting should be also investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据