4.7 Article

High sorption efficiency for As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solutions using novel almond shell biochar

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125330

关键词

Arsenic; Biochar; FTIR; Sorption; XPS

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan [1430/SRGP/RD/HEC/2016]
  2. Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan
  3. Center of Nanotechnology, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic (As) presence in surface reservoirs and groundwater is considered as an extremely alarming issue around the globe. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the sorption potential of almond shell (ALS) and almond shell biochar (ASB) based sorbents for the removal of As(III)/As(V) from As-contaminated aqueous solutions. The maximum As(III) sorption capacity of ALS and ASB were 4.6 and 4.86 mg g(-1), respectively at an initial As concentration of 5 mg L-1, pH similar to 7.2 and sorbent dose of 0.6 g L-1. Similarly, in case of As(V) the maximum sorption capacities were reported as 3.45 and 3.6 mg g(-1) by ALS and ASB respectively. Almond shell biochar removed 10-25% higher As(III)/As(V) compared to the ALS. The isotherm modeling results revealed that both for As(III) and As(V), Langmuir model presented the suitable fit to the equilibrium data compared to other model showing the monolayer sorption to be a dominant sorption mechanism. The FUR and XPS spectroscopy revealed that mostly -OH functional groups along with some other aromatic and/or aliphatic carbon- and oxygen-rich groups (C=C-C, -C-H, C==0) were responsible for As sorption by both sorbents. It is concluded that ASB can remove As, notably As(III) from water more efficiently compared to natural ALS. Overall, the results of this research reveal that biochar conversion of ALS can enhance the sorption capacity for As in contaminated waters such as drinking water and wastewater. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据