4.6 Article

Deletion of the membrane complement inhibitor CD59a drives age and gender-dependent alterations to bone phenotype in mice

期刊

BONE
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 253-261

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.12.014

关键词

CD59a; Bone; Osteoclast; Ageing; Micro-CT

资金

  1. School of Medicine
  2. Rheumatology Research Fund (Cardiff University)
  3. Arthritis Research UK PhD studentship [18598]
  4. Arthritis Research UK Centre grant [18461]
  5. MRC [MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degenerative joint diseases such as osteoarthritis are characterised by aberrant region-specific bone formation and abnormal bone mineral content. A recent study suggested a role for the complement membrane attack complex in experimental models of osteoarthritis. Since CD59a is the principal regulator of the membrane attack complex in mice, we evaluated the impact of CD59a gene deletion upon maintenance of bone architecture. In vivo bone morphology analysis revealed that male CD59a-deficient mice have increased femur length and cortical bone volume, albeit with reduced bone mineral density. However, this phenomenon was not observed in female mice. Histomorphometric analysis of the trabecular bone showed increased rates of bone homeostasis, with both increased bone resorption and mineral apposition rate in CD59a-deficient male mice. When bone cells were studied in isolation, in vitro osteoclastogenesis was significantly increased in male CD59a-deficient mice, although osteoblast formation was not altered. Our data reveal, for the first time, that CD59a is a regulator of bone growth and homeostasis. CD59a ablation in male mice results in longer and wider bones, but with less density, which is likely a major contributing factor for their susceptibility to osteoarthritis. These findings increase our understanding of the role of complement regulation in degenerative arthritis. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据