4.7 Article

Pharmacokinetic study of precisely representative antidepressant, prokinetic, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative compounds from Fructus aurantii and Magnolia Bark

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 315, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.108851

关键词

Fructus aurantii-Magnolia bark; Pharmacokinetics; Anti-inflammation; Anti-oxidation; Antidepressant; Prokinetics

资金

  1. National Natural Science foundation of China [81573797, 81072967]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  3. high-level talents of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Currently, few herbal pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters have been applied successfully for therapeutic monitoring because of the complexity of consistency when there are multiple chemicals and efficacies. Purpose: The present study aims to evaluate the herbal PK properties by investigating the PK parameters of the 8 absorbed bioactive compounds (ABCs), which can represent its parent herbal holistic efficacy, to achieve a PK therapeutic monitoring of herbs. Method: First, we tested the hypothesis that the antidepressant and prokinetic effects and related anti-inflammation and anti-oxidation activity (APIO) by Fructus aurantii-Magnolia Bark (FM) formula are related to 8 compounds according to the absorbable evidence and the determined contents. Subsequently, stable and representative APIO from 8ABCs allowed us to develop a sensitive and selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous determination of 8 compounds following the oral administration of FM decoction (20 g/kg) in rats. Result: 8 compounds either including Meranzin hydrate (MH) or MH alone almost identically (8 compounds: 91.62-108.82%)or nearly(MH: 65.38-88.41%) replicated the parent formula FM in terms of efficacy for inducing APIO. Conclusion: This unifying strategy shows how multi-herb formulas pharmacokinetic therapeutic monitoring can be achieved by the method we established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据