4.7 Article

Effect of fluorine doping and sulfur vacancies of CuCo2S4 on its electrochemical performance in supercapacitors

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 390, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124643

关键词

CuCo2S4; Fluorine dopant; Sulfide vacancy; Electrochemical performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [51975215, 61574060]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19511120100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intriguing features of copper cobalt sulfide (CuCo2S4), such as multiple Faradaic reactions and abundant valance states, enable it a promising electrode material for supercapacitors. However, the sluggish transfer kinetics of charges and the insufficient number of active sites hamper its practical application. Herein, an efficient strategy was proposed to boost the electrochemical performance of CuCo2S4 through a synergetic incorporation of F dopants and S vacancies. The induced effects of F dopant and S vacancy of CuCo2S4 (denoted as F-CuCo2S4-x) on the physical characteristics and the electrochemical behaviors were investigated systemically. Experimental results reveal that through introduction of F dopants and S vacancies in dominant lattice, the low oxidation state concentrations of Cu and Co species are boosted remarkably, which lead to the improved electric conductivity and the enhanced interfacial activities of F-CuCo2S4-x, and facilitate the reaction kinetics. The assynthesized F-CuCo2S4-x exhibits the ultrahigh specific capacity of 2202.7 C g(-1) at 1 A g(-1), and the excellent capacity retention of 96.7% after 5000 cycles at 20 A g(-1). An asymmetric supercapacitor assembled with F-CuCo2S4-x and activated carbon as the positive and the negative electrodes, respectively, delivers the favorable energy density of 49.8 W h kg(-1) at 897.39 W kg(-1), as well as the long-term cycling lifetime. This study offers an effective strategy to optimize the transition metal compounds for electrochemical energy-storage devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据