4.7 Article

Assesment of the gamma and neutron shielding capabilities of the boro-tellurite glass quaternary containing heavy metal oxide using Geant4 and Phy-X/PSD database

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 46, 期 9, 页码 14090-14096

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.209

关键词

Tellurite glass; Gamma ray shielding; Neutron shielding; Geant4; Phy-X/PSD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This survey was conducted to reveal the gamma and neutron stopping performance of the 30PbO-10ZnO-(60-x)TeO2-xB(2)O(3) (x = 0, 10, 20, 30, 50% mole) glass quaternary. Gamma and neutron attenuation parameters including the linear attenuation coefficient (mu), transmission fraction (TF), half value layer (HVL), mean free path (MFP), effective atomic number (Z(eff)), exposure buildup factor (EBF) and fast neutron removal cross-section (Sigma(R)) were determined computationally using the Geant4 and Phy-X/PSD database tools and for photon energies ranging between 0.284 MeV and 2.510 MeV. It was found that increasing the B2O3 content from 0% to 50% mole and correspondingly decreasing the TeO2 content from 60% to 10% mole results in a degradation of mu by 18.2% and of Z(eff) by 28.6% at 0.284 MeV. Due to this decrease in mu and Z(ef)f, the values of TF and HVL increased by 37.3% and 22.4% respectively. In the present study it was also observed that the density (rho) of glass quaternary decreased with the decreasing content of TeO2, and that the density of glass has a remarkable effect on the photon attenuation characteristics. The Degradation of mu, Z(eff), rho and the increase of TF and HVL proves that the photon attenuation ability of the glasses investigated worsens with decreasing content of TeO2, as Tellurium's atomic number and atomic mass are high compared to those of boron. While the decrease of TeO2 weakens the photon attenuation performance, it was found that fast neutron attenuation increases as 30PbO-10ZnO- increases from 0.108 to 0.116 for the glass specimens containing 60% and 10% mole of TeO2 respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据