4.7 Article

Influence of TMAH and NaOH on the stability of SiC aqueous suspensions

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 11208-11217

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.142

关键词

Silicon carbide aqueous suspensions; TMAH; NaOH; Sedimentation; XPS measurements; Oxide sintering activators

资金

  1. Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology [16.16.160.557]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed at evaluation of the rheological properties of aqueous suspensions of SiC stabilized with either TMAH (tetramethyloammonium hydroxide) or NaOH in the amount of a given dispersant in the range of 0-1.0 wt% as calculated on the dry mass of SiC powder. The optimal amount of the dispersants was finally evaluated at 0.4-0.6 wt %, based on the results of rheological studies (flow curves and viscosity curves) and the sedimentation rate, which corresponded to the pH of the suspension within the range of 9.5-10.5. The amount of the dispersant here did not depend on the solid volume fraction in the suspension, but rather, according to the zeta potential measurement results, the pH range guaranteed the formation of a stable suspension. This effect allowed to propose a dispersant mechanism for stabilizing the suspension. The maximum amount of silicate anions formed, accordingly, in the pH range of 9.5-10.5 on the surface of SiC particles, which in turn could be able to adsorb Na+ or TMA(+ )cations and thus increase the thickness of the Stern layer, increasing electrostatic repulsion between the SiC particles and improving the stabilization of suspensions and their rheological properties. However, the increase in suspension pH deteriorated their stabilization - most likely due to the occurrence of polymerization of amorphous silica and the presence of additional cations in water increasing its ionic strength. These suggestions were confirmed by the results of XPS analysis of the chemical state of SiC particle surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据