4.7 Article

Microwave hybrid sintering of Al2O3 and Al2O3-ZrO2 composites, and effects of ZrO2 crystal structure on mechanical properties, thermal properties, and sintering kinetics

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 9002-9010

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.147

关键词

Microwave hybrid sintering; Alumina-zirconia composite; Fracture toughness; Stress-induced transformation toughening; Activation energy

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Ministry of Education, Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [NRF-2018R1D1A1B07043025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structural ceramics such as Al2O3 and Al2O3-ZrO2 composites are widely used in harsh environment applications. The conventional sintering process for fabrication of these ceramics is time-consuming method that requires large amount of energy. Microwave sintering is a novel way to resolve this problem. However, to date, very limited research has been carried out to study the effects of different ZrO2 crystal structures on Al2O3-ZrO2 composites, especially on the sintering kinetics, when fabricated by microwave sintering. The microwave hybrid sintering of Al2O3 and Al2O3-ZrO2 composites was performed in this study. Tetragonal zirconia and cubic zirconia were used as two different reinforcements for an alpha-alumina matrix, and the mechanical and thermal properties were studied. It was found that Al2O3 experienced a remarkable increase in fracture toughness of up to 42% when t-ZrO2 was added. Al2O3-c-ZrO2 also showed increased fracture toughness. The sintering kinetics were also thoroughly investigated, and the average activation energy values for the intermediate stage of sintering were estimated to be 246 +/- 11 kJ/mol for pure Al2O3, 319 +/- 71 kJ/mol for Al2O3-c-ZrO2, and 342 +/- 77 kJ/mol for Al2O3-t-ZrO2. These values indicated that the activation energy was increased by the addition of either type of ZrO2, with the highest value shown by Al2O3-t-ZrO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据