4.3 Article

Cellular stress responses of Eleginops maclovinus fish injected with Piscirickettsia salmonis and submitted to thermal stress

期刊

CELL STRESS & CHAPERONES
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 93-104

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12192-019-01051-6

关键词

Eleginops maclovinus; Heat shock proteins; Sub-Antarctic Notothenioid; Gene expression; Thermal stress; Piscirickettsia salmonis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluctuations in ambient temperature along with the presence of pathogenic microorganisms can induce important cellular changes that alter the homeostasis of ectothermic fish. The aim of this study was to evaluate how sudden or gradual changes in environmental temperature together with the administration of Piscirickettsia salmonis modulate the transcription of genes involved in cellular stress response in the liver of Eleginops maclovinus. Fish were subjected to the following experimental conditions in duplicate: C- 12 degrees C: Injection only with culture medium, C+ 12 degrees C: Injection with P. salmonis, AM 18 degrees C: Injection only with culture medium under acclimation at 18 degrees C, AB 18 degrees C: Injection with P. salmonis under acclimation at 18 degrees C, SM 18 degrees C: Injection only with culture medium and thermal shock at 18 degrees C and SB 18 degrees C: Injection with P. salmonis and thermal shock at 18 degrees C and sampling at 4-, 8-, 12-, 16- and 20-day post injection (dpi). The genes implied in the heat shock response (HSP70, HSC70, HSP90, and GRP78), apoptosis pathway (BAX and SMAC/Diablo), ubiquitination (E2, E3, ubiquitin, and CHIP), and 26 proteasome complex (PSMB7, PSMC1, and PSMA2) showed expression profiles dependent on time and type of injection applied. All the genes greatly increased their expression levels at day 16 and showed moderate increases at day 20, except for PSMA2 which showed a higher increase between 4- and 12-day post challenges. Our results suggest that the changes observed at the final days of the experiment are due to temperature more than P. salmonis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据