4.8 Article

Host-Specific Evolutionary and Transmission Dynamics Shape the Functional Diversification of Staphylococcus epidermidis in Human Skin

期刊

CELL
卷 180, 期 3, 页码 454-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jackson Laboratory Scientific Services Innovation Fund
  2. National Institutes of Health [1U54NS105539, 1 U19 AI142733, 1 R21 AR075174, 1 R43 AR073562, DP2 GM126893-01]
  3. Department of Defense [W81XWH1810229]
  4. National Science Foundation [1853071]
  5. American Cancer Society
  6. LEO Foundation
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1853071] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1853071] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W81XWH1810229] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metagenomic inferences of bacterial strain diversity and infectious disease transmission studies largely assume a dominant, within-individual haplotype. We hypothesize that within-individual bacterial population diversity is critical for homeostasis of a healthy microbiome and infection risk. We characterized the evolutionary trajectory and functional distribution of Staphylococcus epidermidis-a keystone skin microbe and opportunistic pathogen. Analyzing 1,482 S. epidermidis genomes from 5 healthy individuals, we found that skin S. epidermidis isolates coalesce into multiple founder lineages rather than a single colonizer. Transmission events, natural selection, and pervasive horizontal gene transfer result in population admixture within skin sites and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes within-individual. We provide experimental evidence for how admixture can modulate virulence and metabolism. Leveraging data on the contextual microbiome, we assess how interspecies interactions can shape genetic diversity and mobile gene elements. Our study provides insights into how within-individual evolution of human skin microbes shapes their functional diversification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据