Vascular effects of serelaxin in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

Aims The effects of serelaxin, a recombinant form of human retaxin-2 peptide, on vascular function in the coronary microvascular and systemic macrovascular circulation remain largely unknown. This mechanistic, clinical study assessed the effects of serelaxin on myocardial perfusion, aortic stiffness, and safety in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and results In this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 58 patients were randomized 1:1 to 48 h intravenous infusion of serelaxin (30 mu g/kg/day) or matching placebo. The primary endpoints were change from baseline to 47 h post-initiation of the infusion in global myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessed using adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and apptanation tonometry-derived augmentation index (Alx). Secondary endpoints were: change from baseline in Alx and pulse wave velocity, assessed at 47 h, Day 30, and Day 180; aortic distensibility at 47h; pharmacokinetics and safety. Exploratory endpoints were the effect on cardiorenal biomarkers [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), endothelin-1, and cystatin C]. Of 58 patients, 51 were included in the primary analysis (serelaxin, n = 25; placebo, n= 26). After 2 and 6 h of serelaxin infusion, mean placebo-corrected blood pressure reductions of -9.6 mmHg (P = 0.01) and -13.5 mmHg (P = 0.0003) for systolic blood pressure and -5.2 mmHg (P = 0.02) and -8.4 mmHg (P = 0.001) for diastolic blood pressure occurred. There were no between-group differences from baseline to 47 h in global M PR (-0.24 vs. -0.13, P = 0.44) or Alx (3.49% vs. 0.04%, P=0.21) with serelaxin compared with placebo. Endothelin-1 and cystatin C levels decreased from baseline in the serelaxin group, and there were no clinically relevant changes observed with serelaxin for NT-proBNP or hsTnT. Similar numbers of serious adverse events were observed in both groups (serelaxin, n = 5; placebo, n = 7) to 180-day follow-up. Conclusion In patients with stable CAD, 48 h intravenous serelaxin reduced blood pressure but did not alter myocardial perfusion.

Automated summary

The study aimed to evaluate the effects of serelaxin on patients with stable CAD, showing that serelaxin can reduce blood pressure but does not affect myocardial perfusion, with consistent safety profiles observed in both groups.