4.7 Article

Chain conformation, physicochemical properties of fucosylated chondroitin sulfate from sea cucumber Stichopus chloronotus and its in vitro fermentation by human gut microbiota

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115359

关键词

Stichopus chloronotus; Fucosylated chondroitin sulfate; Chain conformation; Physicochemical properties; Gut microbiota; In vitro fermentation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41806176]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2019PD006]
  3. Medicine and Health Science Technology Development Project of Shandong Province [2016WSB27019]
  4. Chinese Medicine Science Technology Development Project of Shandong Province [2017-206]
  5. Science and Technology Development Project of Weifang City [2019GX023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the chain conformation, physicochemical properties of fucosylated chondroitin sulfate from Stichopus chloronotus (fCS-Sc) using HPSEC-MALLS and worm-like cylinder model methods and its impact on human gut microbiota by 16s RNA gene sequencing. The results indicated that fCS-Sc adopted rigid rods chain conformation in PBS based on chain conformational parameters alpha(eta) (1.11) and alpha(h) (0.70). Stiffness parameters deduced from worm-like cylinder model suggested that fCS-Sc exhibited as stiff chains. The congo red assay indicated a single-helical structure. fCS-Sc demonstrated a negative zeta-potentials in a wide pH ranges and good thermal stability. Besides, fCS-Sc could modulate the community structure of gut microbiota by elevating the absolute abundance of microbiota, increasing the beneficial bacterium Megamonas, Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, Parabacteroides, Prevotella, Faecalibacterium, suppressing pathogenic microorganism and promoting the short-chain fatty acids production. The present studies improved the understanding of the spatial structures of fCSs and its application as prebiotics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据