4.7 Article

SOX9/miR-203a axis drives PI3K/AKT signaling to promote esophageal cancer progression

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 468, 期 -, 页码 14-26

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.10.004

关键词

ESCC; Prognosis; miRNA; Rapamycin

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81902850, 81460416, 81560399, 81602810, 81760428, 81773116]
  2. National Early Detection and Treatment Project for Upper Digestive Tract in Rural Area in China
  3. State Scholarship Foundation of China [201608650002]
  4. Youth Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talents Project of Corps [2017CB004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deregulation of SOX9 in esophageal cancer has been reported. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying SOX9 during esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) progression remain poorly understood. Here, we independently confirmed the increased SOX9 expression in two ESCC cohorts and its correlation with poor prognosis. We demonstrated that SOX9 was required for maintaining self-renewal, motility, and chemoresistance in vitro and that ectopic expression of SOX9 promoted tumorigenicity in vivo. Screening for potential SOX9-regulated miRNAs revealed that target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs were enriched in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and identified the downregulated miR-203a as a candidate. Mechanistically, SOX9 activation caused repression of miR-203a transcription by binding to miR-203a promoter, thus preventing the miR-203a-mediated inhibition of multiple PI3K/AKT/mTOR components, including PIK3CA, AKT2, and RPS6KB1. The association between SOX9 expression and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling was further validated in clinical samples. Moreover, rapamycin treatment attenuated the SOX9-mediated malignant phenotypes and potentiated cisplatin-mediated inhibition of tumor growth. Together, these findings uncover a novel activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway by the SOX9/miR-203a axis and define a subgroup of patients who may benefit from targeted therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据