4.8 Article

Treatment-Induced Tumor Dormancy through YAP-Mediated Transcriptional Reprogramming of the Apoptotic Pathway

期刊

CANCER CELL
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 104-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.12.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [NIH 5 P30 CA06516]
  2. Cancer Center Support Grant at NYU Langone's Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center [P30CA016087]
  3. National Cancer Institute [R01CA135257, R35CA220497]
  4. American Cancer Society [CRP-17-111-01-CDD]
  5. Claudia Adams Barr Program for Innovative Cancer Research
  6. Ildiko Medve and Adria Sai-Halasz EGFR Lung Cancer Research Fund
  7. Balassiano Family Fund for Lung Cancer Research
  8. Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation
  9. Instrumentarium Science Foundation
  10. Orion Research Foundation
  11. Swiss Cancer League [KLS-3625-02 2015]
  12. Swiss National Science Foundation, Swizerland [P300PB_161026/1, P400PM_183862]
  13. NIH [R01 CA222218, CA233800]
  14. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P300PB_161026, P400PM_183862] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eradicating tumor dormancy that develops following epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, is an attractive therapeutic strategy but the mechanisms governing this process are poorly understood. Blockade of ERK1/2 reactivation following EGFR TKI treatment by combined EGFR/MEK inhibition uncovers cells that survive by entering a senescence-like dormant state characterized by high YAP/TEAD activity. YAP/TEAD engage the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition transcription factor SLUG to directly repress pro-apoptotic BMF, limiting drug-induced apoptosis. Pharmacological co-inhibition of YAP and TEAD, or genetic deletion of YAP1, all deplete dormant cells by enhancing EGFR/MEK inhibition-induced apoptosis. Enhancing the initial efficacy of targeted therapies could ultimately lead to prolonged treatment responses in cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据