4.3 Article

Application of culturomics to characterize diverse anaerobic bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens in relation to environmental reservoirs

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 66, 期 4, 页码 288-302

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2019-0469

关键词

culturomics; chickens; anaerobic bacteriology; direct plating; enrichments; microbiome; gastrointestinal tract

资金

  1. Canadian Poultry Research Council (Poultry Science Cluster) [1374]
  2. Canada Graduate Scholarship (Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada) [CGS-D3]
  3. University of Alberta
  4. Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency [2016E002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characterization of the microbiota of chickens is of current interest. The goals of the current study were to apply anaerobic isolation methods to comprehensively isolate and identify bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract of chickens and their environment. Bacterial communities within the drinking water were dominated by Escherichia, whereas communities in litter were more representative of the cecum. The crop and small intestine (jejunum and ileum) were dominated by Lactobacillus and Enterococcus spp., and the cecum was dominated by Proteus spp. The collection of bacteria isolated was dominated by Enterococcus spp., Escherichia/Shigella spp., Lactobacillus spp., and Proteus spp.; however, many rare taxa were observed. These included members of the Clostridiales and Clostridium spp., which were commonly isolated from the ileum and cecum. Bacteria isolated by enrichment and direct plating differed. The selective de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe agar was commonly associated with the isolation of Lactobacillus spp. and yielded the lowest diversity of all methods utilized. Increased diversity and frequency of Clostridium spp. was observed in enrichments of blood and mucus or by plating on Columbia agar supplemented with 10% blood and gentamicin. The bacteria isolated from this study provide source material for genomic and functional studies in chicken hosts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据