4.4 Article

The effect of a new wound dressing on wound healing: Biochemical and histopathological evaluation

期刊

BURNS
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 143-155

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.013

关键词

Collagen; Doxycycline; Nanofiber; Oxidative stress; Wound healing

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [213M689]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrospinning process has gained importance in the production of wound dressings in recent years. The wound dressings prepared by electrospinning method provide many advantages over conventional wound dressings. The aim of this study was to assess the histological, biochemical, and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen/doxycycline loaded nanofiber wound dressing in both acute and chronic wound healing. Full-thickness wound model was created on rats and rats were divided in two main groups: normoglycemic (acute) and hyperglycemic (chronic) groups. Each group was divided into three sub groups: not treated (control) group, treated with nanofiber wound dressing group and treated with commercial product group. Wound closure rates were measured. Oxidative events were investigated by biochemical analyses. In addition to histological studies, matrix metalloproteinase, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase, vascular endothelial growth factor, basic-fibroblast growth factor, and von Willebrand factor levels were investigated with immunohistochemical studies. According to the biochemical analyses, it was concluded that the nanofiber wound dressing helps to increase antioxidant capacity and decrease lipid peroxidation. Immunohistochemical studies showed that nanofiber wound dressing enhanced angiogenesis and shortened the inflammatory phase. It was concluded that an effective and safe prototype nanofiber wound dressing, which has similar wound healing effect to the commercial product, has been developed to be used in acute or chronic wound treatment. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据