4.5 Article

Milk allergy is a minor cause of milk avoidance due to perceived hypersensitivity among schoolchildren in Northern Sweden

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 105, 期 2, 页码 206-214

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.13253

关键词

Body mass index; Child; Cow's milk; Epidemiology; Food allergy

资金

  1. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
  2. Swedish research council
  3. Swedish Asthma and Allergy Foundation
  4. VISARE Norr
  5. Umea University
  6. Vasterbotten County Council (ALF)
  7. State Government funding for Health Care research (FoU)
  8. Jerring Foundation
  9. ThermoFisher Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: We investigated phenotypes of milk hypersensitivity among schoolchildren aged 11-12 in Northern Sweden. Methods: In a population-based cohort, 1824 (98%) children aged 11-12 participated in a questionnaire survey, skin prick testing, interviews on food hypersensitivity and assessment of body mass index (BMI). Of the 265 children reporting milk hypersensitivity, milk avoidance and no coeliac disease, 236 (89%) participated in a structured interview and blood samples for analyses of milk-specific Immunoglobulin E. The children were then categorised into milk hypersensitivity phenotypes according to preset criteria. Results: In all, 14.5% reported milk hypersensitivity. Of these, 3% were categorised as current milk allergy, 23% as outgrown milk allergy, 40% as probable lactose intolerance and 11% as nondefinable. Furthermore, 23% had discontinued their elimination diet. Milk allergy was associated with other atopic disorders and lower BMI, with an odds ratio of 0.82 and 95% confidence interval of 0.80-0.98. Only 2% had previously undergone an oral challenge. Conclusion: The most common symptom phenotypes among Swedish children aged 11-12 with self-reported milk hypersensitivity and milk avoidance were probable intolerance and outgrown milk allergy, while current milk allergy was uncommon. Children with milk allergy had a lower BMI and most lacked a challenge-proven diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据