4.7 Article

Detection and prognostic role of heterogeneous populations of melanoma circulating tumour cells

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 122, 期 7, 页码 1059-1067

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0750-9

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1013349]
  2. Cancer Council WA (CCWA)
  3. CCWA Suzanne Cavanagh Early Career Investigator (2016)
  4. Edith Cowan University Early Career Research grant (2016)
  5. Cancer Research Trust
  6. CCWA
  7. Western Australian Health Translation Early Career Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) can be assessed through a minimally invasive blood sample with potential utility as a predictive, prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarker. The large heterogeneity of melanoma CTCs has hindered their detection and clinical application. Methods Here we compared two microfluidic devices for the recovery of circulating melanoma cells. The presence of CTCs in 43 blood samples from patients with metastatic melanoma was evaluated using a combination of immunocytochemistry and transcript analyses of five genes by RT-PCR and 19 genes by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), whereby a CTC score was calculated. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from the same patient blood sample, was assessed by ddPCR targeting tumour-specific mutations. Results Our analysis revealed an extraordinary heterogeneity amongst melanoma CTCs, with multiple non-overlapping subpopulations. CTC detection using our multimarker approach was associated with shorter overall and progression-free survival. Finally, we found that CTC scores correlated with plasma ctDNA concentrations and had similar pharmacodynamic changes upon treatment initiation. Conclusions Despite the high phenotypic and molecular heterogeneity of melanoma CTCs, multimarker derived CTC scores could serve as viable tools for prognostication and treatment response monitoring in patients with metastatic melanoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据