4.7 Article

Kinetic modelling of quantitative proteome data predicts metabolic reprogramming of liver cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 233-244

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0659-3

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [0316172]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Cr 133/2-1, Cr 133/3-1]
  3. Deutsche Krebshilfe [109160]
  4. Senate of Berlin
  5. Berlin Institute of Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB)
  6. Berlin Institute of Health (BIH)
  7. Q3 European Union Horizon 2020 grant SyMBioSys (MSCA-ITN-2015-ETN) [675585]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Metabolic alterations can serve as targets for diagnosis and cancer therapy. Due to the highly complex regulation of cellular metabolism, definite identification of metabolic pathway alterations remains challenging and requires sophisticated experimentation. Methods We applied a comprehensive kinetic model of the central carbon metabolism (CCM) to characterise metabolic reprogramming in murine liver cancer. Results We show that relative differences of protein abundances of metabolic enzymes obtained by mass spectrometry can be used to assess their maximal velocity values. Model simulations predicted tumour-specific alterations of various components of the CCM, a selected number of which were subsequently verified by in vitro and in vivo experiments. Furthermore, we demonstrate the ability of the kinetic model to identify metabolic pathways whose inhibition results in selective tumour cell killing. Conclusions Our systems biology approach establishes that combining cellular experimentation with computer simulations of physiology-based metabolic models enables a comprehensive understanding of deregulated energetics in cancer. We propose that modelling proteomics data from human HCC with our approach will enable an individualised metabolic profiling of tumours and predictions of the efficacy of drug therapies targeting specific metabolic pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据