4.6 Article

An automated machine learning-based model predicts postoperative mortality using readily-extractable preoperative electronic health record data

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 123, 期 6, 页码 877-886

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.07.030

关键词

electronic health record; hospital mortality; machine learning; perioperative outcome; risk assessment

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1705197, III-1705121]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [K99MH116115]
  3. National Institute of Health [R00GM111744, R35GM125055]
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  5. Okawa Foundation
  6. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institute of Health [T32NS048004]
  7. UCLA QCB Collaboratory Postdoctoral Fellowship
  8. Bial Foundation
  9. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1650604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Rapid, preoperative identification of patients with the highest risk for medical complications is necessary to ensure that limited infrastructure and human resources are directed towards those most likely to benefit. Existing risk scores either lack specificity at the patient level or utilise the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, which requires a clinician to review the chart. Methods: We report on the use of machine learning algorithms, specifically random forests, to create a fully automated score that predicts postoperative in-hospital mortality based solely on structured data available at the time of surgery. Electronic health record data from 53 097 surgical patients (2.01% mortality rate) who underwent general anaesthesia between April 1, 2013 and December 10, 2018 in a large US academic medical centre were used to extract 58 preoperative features. Results: Using a random forest classifier we found that automatically obtained preoperative features (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.932, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.910-0.951) outperforms Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM) scores (AUC of 0.660, 95% CI 0.598-0.722), Charlson comorbidity scores (AUC of 0.742, 95% CI 0.658-0.812), and ASA physical status (AUC of 0.866, 95% CI 0.829-0.897). Including the ASA physical status with the preoperative features achieves an AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.917-0.955). Conclusions: This automated score outperforms the ASA physical status score, the Charlson comorbidity score, and the POSPOM score for predicting in-hospital mortality. Additionally, we integrate this score with a previously published postoperative score to demonstrate the extent to which patient risk changes during the perioperative period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据