4.5 Article

In deep evaluation of the neurotoxicity of orally administered TiO2 nanoparticles

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 119-128

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.10.005

关键词

Titanium dioxide nanoparticles; Brain; Oxidative stress; Degenerated neurons; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research [UR12ES10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Titanium dioxide nanoparticles were widely used in food as dietary supplements, in drugs, in toothpaste, ect. Few numbers of studies were interested to the neurotoxicity of TiO2 NPs through oral pathway. The present study aims firstly to understand the connection between the physicochemical properties of TiO2 NPs and their associated toxicological oral pathway by evaluation the colloidal stability of TiO2 NPs over time in different media simulating physiological gastric, intestinal and serum conditions at 37 degrees C to be close to the oral administraton. Secondly, this study aims to evaluate the neurotoxicity of a subchronic intragastric administration of TiO2 NPs to rats. Different doses of anatase TiO2 NPs were administrated to Wistar rats every day for consecutives eight weeks. Titanium (Ti) content in brain, oxidative antioxidant biomarkers, lipid peroxidation, nitric oxide (NO) levels, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels, histophatological changes, degenerated and apoptosis neurons were investigated. Results suggested that TiO2 NPs can reach the brain and cross the brain blood barrier (BBB) to been accumulated in the brain of rats causing cerebral oxidative stress damage, increasing NO levels and histopathological injury. At higher dose, we observed the most cerebral injury by the highest accumulation of Ti and by the remarkable increase of TNF-alpha besides to the most increase of degenerated and apoptosis neurons in the brain of exposed rats. TiO2 NPs led to a neurotoxic damage accompanied by the increase of degenerated and apoptotic neurons in cerebral cortex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据