4.7 Article

Microglial activation contributes to depressive-like behavior in dopamine D3 receptor knockout mice

期刊

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 226-238

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.10.016

关键词

D3R; Depressive-like behavior; Microglia; Pro-inflammatory cytokines; BDNF; Neuroplasticity

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81871537, 81430048]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously demonstrated that the dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) inhibitor, NGB2904, increases susceptibility to depressive-like symptoms, elevates pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, and alters brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in mesolimbic dopaminergic regions, including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), nucleus accumbens (NAc), and ventral tegmental area (VTA) in mice. The mechanisms by which D3R inhibition affects neuroinflammation and onset of depression remain unclear. Here, using D3R-knockout (D3RKO) and congenic wild-type C56BL/6 (WT) mice, we demonstrated that D3RKO mice displayed depressive-like behaviors, increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), and IL-6 levels, and altered BDNF expression in selected mesolimbic dopaminergic regions. D3R expression was localized to astrocytes or microglia in the mPFC, NAc, and VTA in WT mice. D3RKO mice exhibited a large number of Iba1-labelled microglia in the absence of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-labelled astrocytes in mesolimbic dopaminergic brain areas. Inhibition or ablation of microglia by minocycline (25 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg) or PLX3397 (40 mg/kg) treatment ameliorated depressive-like symptoms, alterations in pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, and BDNF expression in the indicated brain regions in D3RKO mice. Minocycline therapy alleviated the increase in synaptic density in the NAc in D3RKO mice. These findings suggest that microglial activation in selected mesolimbic reward regions affects depressive-like behaviors induced by D3R deficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据