4.8 Article

Promotion of short-chain fatty acids production and fermented sludge properties via persulfate treatments with different activators: Performance and mechanisms

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 295, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122278

关键词

Peroxydisulfate (PDS); Peroxymonosulfate (PMS); Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs); Anaerobic fermentation; Waste activated sludge (WAS); Dewaterability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708171, 51878243]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019B14314]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630508, 2019T120390]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation, China [PCRRF17019]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the influences of peroxydisulfate (PDS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activated with different catalysts on the anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge (WAS). All the treatments were effective in promoting short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production, particularly acetic acid, in the order of PMS/MnO2 > PMS/Zn > PDS/Zn > PMS/Fe > PDS/Fe > PDS/MnO2. Mechanistic investigations demonstrated that WAS disintegration was intensely induced by the free radicals (i.e., SO4 center dot- and center dot OH) generated in PDS and PMS treating reactors. It significantly promoted the solubilization and hydrolysis processes and thereby provided sufficient bioavailable substrates for further acidogenic metabolisms. Additionally, it enlarged the abundance of functional bacteria responsible for SCFAs production. The simultaneous promotion of bioavailable substrates and fermentative microorganisms markedly contributed to the SCFAs enhancement. Moreover, the dewaterability and stabilization of fermented sludge were both improved with the PDS and PMS treatments, which were beneficial to the final disposal of WAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据