4.8 Article

Tribonema sp. and Chlorella zofingiensis co-culture to treat swine wastewater diluted with fishery wastewater to facilitate harvest

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122516

关键词

Tribonema sp.; Chlorella zofingiensis; Co-culture; Swine wastewater; Fishery wastewater; Harvest efficiency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31560724]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY20D060003]
  3. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program [20180042]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017T100583, 2016M600616]
  5. Ningbo Municipal Science and Technology Project [2019C10071]
  6. Ningbo Municipal Natural Science Foundation [431901822]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20171BAB214014]
  8. Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Ecological Environment and Resource Development [PK2017001]
  9. Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cultivating microalgae on wastewaters is an effective way to produce algal biomass whereas harvesting microalgae is a costly operation. This study we examined the feasibility of co-culturing a high-value microalga with an auto-flocculating strain to enable efficient recovery of biomass. Experiments were conducted to co-cultivate Chlorella zofingiensis with Tribonema sp. on swine wastewater diluted by fishery wastewater under different conditions. The result showed the optimal inoculum ratio of Tribonema sp. to Chlorella zofingiensis was 1:1. The removal efficiencies of pollutants (NH4+-N, TN, TP, and COD) and lipid content were high when the co-culture ratios of Tribonema sp. were high. Also, some larger chain fatty acids, specifically C20:5 and C22:6 were present when the two strains co-culture. The recovery efficiency increased with the increasing proportion of auto-flocculating Tribonema sp.. Algae co-culture has the potential to address limitations in substrate utilization by individual strains, also improve the recovery of biomass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据