4.7 Article

Design, synthesis, in vitro antimicrobial evaluation and molecular docking studies of indol-2-one tagged with morpholinosulfonyl moiety as DNA gyrase inhibitors

期刊

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103619

关键词

Schiff bases; Hydrazones; Antimicrobial evaluation; Multi-drug resistance study (MDRS); DNA gyrase inhibitors; Molecular docking

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [140/40]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of Schiff bases 3, 5, 7 and hydrazones 9 were achieved via reaction of 5-(morpholinosulfonyl)indol-2,3-dione (1) with appropriate amines and/or hydrazide derivatives. Representative compounds of the synthesized products were tested and evaluated as antimicrobial agents. According to MIC and MBC results from compounds 9a, 9c, 7a, 3b, 3c, and Sb were able to exhibit significant antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria together with moderate antifungal activities. Also, a multi-drug resistance study (MDRS) was carried out to evaluate the activity of most potent compounds, and these compounds showed considerable results compared with Norfloxacin and Tetracycline which observed no results against strains used in this study. The inhibitory activity of most potent compounds (3b, 3c, 5b, 7a, 9a, and 9c) against DNA gyrase isolated from S. aureus was examined. The results indicated that all of these derivatives inhibiting DNA gyrase and therefore lead to separate bacterial DNA and inhibit cell division. Compounds 3b, 9c showed to be very potent inhibitors towards S. aureus DNA gyrase with IC50 values (18.75 +/- 1.2 and 19.32 +/- 0.99 mu M) respectively, compared with Ciprofloxacin (26.43 +/- 0.64 mu M). Molecular docking studies indicated that the synthesized compounds observed good binding with the enzyme and showed lower binding energy of the most promising compounds than a standard drug used, and enabled a better understanding of their structural features.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据