4.2 Article

Detection and Monitoring of Lineage-Specific Chimerism by Digital Droplet PCR-Based Testing of Deletion/Insertion Polymorphisms

期刊

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 1218-1224

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.02.016

关键词

Post-transplantation analysis; InDel; Short tandem repeat; Stem cell transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analysis of specific leukocyte subsets for post-transplantation monitoring of chimerism provides greater sensitivity and clinical informativeness on dynamic changes in donor- and recipient-derived cells. Limitations of the most commonly used approach to chimerism testing relying on PCR-based analysis of microsatellite markers prompted us to assess the applicability of digital droplet (dd) PCR amplification of deletion insertion polymorphisms (DIPs) for lineage-specific chimerism testing in the related stem cell transplantation setting, where the identification of informative markers facilitating the discrimination between donor-derived and recipient-derived cells can be challenging. We analyzed 100 genetically related patient-donor pairs by ddPCR analysis using commercially available DIP kits including large sets of polymorphic markers. At least 1 informative marker was identified in all related pairs analyzed, and 2 or more discriminating markers were detected in the majority (82%) of instances. The achievable detection limit is dependent on the number of cells available for analysis and was as low as 0.1% in the presence of >= 20,000 leukocytes available for DNA extraction. Moreover, the reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative chimerism analysis compared favorably to highly optimized microsatellite assays. Thus, the use of ddPCR-based analysis of DIP markers is an attractive approach to lineage-specific monitoring of chimerism in any allogeneic transplantation setting. (C) 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据