4.7 Article

Effect of organic substitution rates on soil quality and fungal community composition in a tea plantation with long-term fertilization

期刊

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
卷 56, 期 5, 页码 633-646

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-020-01439-y

关键词

Soil quality index; Fungal community; Organic substitution; Tea plantation soils; Network complexity

资金

  1. National Key R&D Project of China [2016YFD0200900]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41601325]
  3. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [CAAS-XTCX2016015, 1610212016012, 1610212018018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Partial substitution of chemical fertilizers by organic amendments is essential for improving the soil quality without yield loss. Fungi play an important role in soil quality because they decompose organic matter and cycle nutrients in the soil. However, there is limited information regarding the effect of different organic substitution rates (OSRs) on the soil quality and fungal community. This study investigated the relationship between the soil quality index and fungal community in a tea plantation under different OSRs of N, from a single application of synthetic fertilizer (NPK) to 100% N substitution with organic fertilizer (OM100). The OSRs were positively correlated with the soil physicochemical and biological soil quality index (SQI), but only the physicochemical SQI exhibited a significant relationship with tea production. The OSR also shifted the soil fungal community composition. Soil pH, soil organic C (SOC), microbial biomass C (MBC), and available potassium (AK) were the key characteristics that were significantly correlated with the variation of soil fungal community. Network analysis indicated that additional organic substitution can enhance the soil fungal network complexity, which also showed a positive correlation with the SQI. These results confirmed the feasibility of organic substitution for soil quality improvement, and implied that the soil fungal network complexity could be a new indicator for soil quality assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据