4.5 Article

C-reactive Protein Signaling and Chromosomal Abnormalities in Nanotoxicity Induced via Different Doses of TiO2 (80 nm) Boost Liver Function

期刊

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
卷 198, 期 1, 页码 157-167

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-020-02030-0

关键词

TiO2-NPs; SOD; CAT; CRP; Chromosomal aberration

资金

  1. National Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The wide application of nanotechnology merits the need to clarify their nanotoxicity. In vivo studies have raised concerns about the toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs), but there are limited data on chromosomal abnormalities induced in hepatic tissue. In this article, the toxicity of three IP doses of TiO2 NPs (80 nm) (50, 250, and 500 mg/kg) through three time intervals (up to 7, 15, and 45 days) on liver tissue was assessed. Hepatic catalase (CAT), glutathione (GSH), nitric oxide (NOx), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels varied with the administered dose and exposure time of TiO2 NPs. As a result, TiO2 NPs caused a statistically significant decrease in hepatic CAT and GSH activities and a significant alleviation in MDA and NOx levels (p < 0.05), suggesting that the liver exposed to these various doses of TiO2 NPs suffered from severe oxidative stress. The extent of depletion of antioxidant enzymes and the elevation of MDA and NOx in the liver exposed to the highest dose and duration of TiO2 NPs 500 mg for 45 days was the greatest, suggesting that the toxicity might be dose and time dependent. Further, C-reactive protein (CRP) as an inflammatory marker was also alleviated, in addition to the apparent chromosomal aberration and liver pathologies including necrotic and fibrotic hepatocytes after exposure to 250 and 500 mg/kg of TiO2 NPs for 14 and 45 days that were deduced. Hence, nanotechnology-based industries are growing rapidly leading to large-scale production of engineered nanoparticles. They contribute to increased chances of human NPs exposure and health risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据