4.5 Article

Hypertension and Salt-Restrictive Diet Promotes Low Urinary Iodine Concentration in High-Risk Pregnant Women: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study Conducted After Salt Iodination Reduction in Brazil

期刊

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
卷 197, 期 2, 页码 445-453

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-020-02028-8

关键词

Iodine; Iodine deficiency; Pregnancy

资金

  1. Fapesb-PPSUS [TOU PET0002/2013] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During pregnancy, the demand for daily iodine increases by 50-70% which occurs to reach around 250 mu g/day. Limited information is available on the association of high-risk pregnancy (HRP) with urinary iodine concentration (UIC) and variables such as socioeconomic factors. To analyze iodine nutritional status and socioeconomic, demographic and anthropometric characteristics among women with HRP screened at the main referral public health center at Bahia, Brazil, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 241 women with HRP (15-46 years old) in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. The median UIC (MUIC) was 119 mu g/L (25-75th, 58.7-200.4 mu g/L), indicating mild iodine deficiency. Low UIC (< 150 mu g/L) was detected in 61.8% (n = 149) - 18.3% between 100 and 150 mu g/L, 24.5% between 50 and 100 mu g/L, and 19.1% with UIC < 50 mu g/L. Overall, 53% (n = 128) of our population adhered to a low-salt diet, and 32.5% (n = 77) had hypertension. Among the 73% of hypertensive women adhering to a salt-restricted diet, there was a 112% increased risk of iodine deficiency observed (OR = 2.127; 95% confidence interval [1.178-3.829];p = 0.011). Adhering to a salt-restricted diet was associated with iodine deficiency (OR = 1.82; 95% confidence interval [1.073-3.088], p = 0,026). Hypertension and salt restriction diet significantly increased susceptibility for iodine deficiency in HRP. Therefore, low-salt diet when prescribed to pregnant women (PW) might be carefully followed by iodine nutritional status assessment or universal preconception iodine supplementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据