4.7 Article

Decline in beetle abundance and diversity in an intact temperate forest linked to climate warming

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108219

关键词

Climate change; Coleoptera; Forest-floor; Hubbard Brook; Insect decline; Temperate deciduous forest

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Wellesley College

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insect abundances are declining in many areas around the world, but the causes of those declines are seldom clear. Here we report a dramatic decline in the abundance and diversity of Coleoptera (beetle) taxa in a large tract of intact northern hardwood forest during the last 45 years, and provide evidence supporting winter warming as the primary cause. Beetles were sampled using the same method (window traps) and in the same locations within the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, in 1973-1977 and again in 2015-2017. The mean (+/- SE) number of beetles captured per 48-h fell from 23.2 (+/- 3.89) to 3.9 (+/- 1.19), a decline of 83% over this 45-year period. The number of beetle taxa captured decreased by 39%, with 19 beetle families disappearing entirely. Beetle capture rate was least when and where climate was warmest. Capture rate was significantly lower in the 2010s when mean daily temperature was about 1.8 degrees C warmer, and sampling during 2016-2017 at low, mid and high elevations (320, 540, and 810 m asl, respectively) revealed lowest beetle captures at low elevation where climate was warmest. Most importantly, beetle capture rate was significantly lower after winters with less snow cover during the previous winter, indicating that snow cover in northern hardwood forest is essential for sustaining the beetle community. These results imply that additional climate warming might further reduce the abundance and diversity of beetles and other arthropods inhabiting the forest-floor, potentially affecting critical ecosystem processes such as decomposition and carbon storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据