4.7 Article

StackCPPred: a stacking and pairwise energy content-based prediction of cell-penetrating peptides and their uptake efficiency

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 36, 期 10, 页码 3028-3034

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa131

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Research Program of Science and Technology of Shenzhen [JCYJ20180306172637807]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M662770]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61472333, 61772441, 61472335, 61272152, 41476118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are a vehicle for transporting into living cells pharmacologically active molecules, such as short interfering RNAs, nanoparticles, plasmid DNAs and small peptides, thus offering great potential as future therapeutics. Existing experimental techniques for identifying CPPs are time-consuming and expensive. Thus, the prediction of CPPs from peptide sequences by using computational methods can be useful to annotate and guide the experimental process quickly. Many machine learning-based methods have recently emerged for identifying CPPs. Although considerable progress has been made, existing methods still have low feature representation capabilities, thereby limiting further performance improvements. Results: We propose a method called StackCPPred, which proposes three feature methods on the basis of the pairwise energy content of the residue as follows: RECM-composition, PseRECM and RECM-DWT. These features are used to train stacking-based machine learning methods to effectively predict CPPs. On the basis of the CPP924 and CPPsite3 datasets with jackknife validation, StackDPPred achieved 94.5% and 78.3% accuracy, which was 2.9% and 5.8% higher than the state-of-the-art CPP predictors, respectively. StackCPPred can be a powerful tool for predicting CPPs and their uptake efficiency, facilitating hypothesis-driven experimental design and accelerating their applications in clinical therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据