4.7 Article

Integrative analysis of cross-modal features for the prognosis prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 36, 期 9, 页码 2888-2895

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa056

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61971213, 61671230]
  2. Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515010417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: As a highly heterogeneous disease, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has quite variable clinical behaviors. The prognostic biomarkers play a crucial role in stratifying patients suffering from ccRCC to avoid over- and under-treatment. Researches based on hand-crafted features and single-modal data have been widely conducted to predict the prognosis of ccRCC. However, these experience-dependent methods, neglecting the synergy among multimodal data, have limited capacity to perform accurate prediction. Inspired by complementary information among multimodal data and the successful application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in medical image analysis, a novel framework was proposed to improve prediction performance. Results: We proposed a cross-modal feature-based integrative framework, in which deep features extracted from computed tomography/histopathological images by using CNNs were combined with eigengenes generated from functional genomic data, to construct a prognostic model for ccRCC. Results showed that our proposed model can stratify high- and low-risk subgroups with significant difference (P-value < 0.05) and outperform the predictive performance of those models based on single-modality features in the independent testing cohort [C-index, 0.808 (0.728-0.888)]. In addition, we also explored the relationship between deep image features and eigengenes, and make an attempt to explain deep image features from the view of genomic data. Notably, the integrative framework is available to the task of prognosis prediction of other cancer with matched multimodal data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据