4.5 Article

miR-21 deficiency contributes to the impaired protective effects of obese rat mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes against spinal cord injury

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 171-178

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2019.10.002

关键词

miR-21; Obesity; Spinal cord injury; Mesenchymal stem cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81701896]
  2. Shaanxi Natural Science Basic Research Foundation [2018JQ8069]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xjj2018jchz03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The therapeutic effect of stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) has been extensively studied these days, and evidence has shown that stem cell-derived exosomes and exosome-shuttled miRNA (e.g. miR-21) contribute to the protective effects of stem cell transplantation against SCI. It has been reported that obesity, a prevalent metabolic disorder, reshapes stem cells and their extracellular vesicles. However, the effects of exosomes derived from obese rat stem cells on SCI and its underlying mechanism remain unknown. Here, we examined the effects of exosomes derived from obese rat mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on SCI, and tested the role of miR-21 in their effects. We found that exosomes derived from obese rat MSCs showed decreased miR-21 levels and did not exert protective effects against SCI. Overexpression of miR-21 in obese rat MSCs restored the protective effects of exosomes purified from obese rat MSCs against SCI. In addition, obese rat MSCs showed insulin resistance, and MSC insulin resistance decreased miR-21 levels in its secreted exosomes. These results suggested that miR-21 deficiency in obese rat MSCs contributes to the impaired protective effects of obese rat MSCs-derived exosomes against SCI, and further reinforced the notion that miR-21 is a potential molecule for treatment of SCI. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. and Societe Francaise de Biochimie et Biologie Moleculaire (SFBBM). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据