4.4 Review

PI3K in sternness regulation: from development to cancer

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 301-315

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20190778

关键词

-

资金

  1. PTEN Research
  2. Cancer Research U.K. [C23338/A25722]
  3. U.K. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I007806/1, BB/M013278/1, BB/R017972/1]
  4. U.K. NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  5. BBSRC [BB/I007806/1, BB/R017972/1, BB/M013278/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The PI3K/AKT pathway is a key target in oncology where most efforts are focussed on phenotypes such as cell proliferation and survival. Comparatively, little attention has been paid to PI3K in sternness regulation, despite the emerging link between acquisition of stern cell-like features and therapeutic failure in cancer. The aim of this review is to summarise current known and unknowns of PI3K-dependent sternness regulation, by integrating knowledge from the fields of developmental, signalling and cancer biology. Particular attention is given to the role of the PI3K pathway in pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) and the emerging parallels to dedifferentiated cancer cells with stern cell-like features. Compelling evidence suggests that PI3K/AKT signalling forms part of a 'core molecular stemness programme' in both mouse and human PSCs. In cancer, the oncogenic PIK3CA(H1047R )variant causes constitutive activation of the PI3K pathway and has recently been linked to increased sternness in a dose-dependent manner, similar to observations in mouse PSCs with heterozygous versus homozygous Pten loss. There is also evidence that the sternness phenotype may become 'locked' and thus independent of the original PI3K activation, posing limitations for the success of PI3K monotherapy in cancer. Ongoing therapeutic developments for PI3K-associated cancers may therefore benefit from a better understanding of the pathway's two-layered and highly context-dependent regulation of cell growth versus sternness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据