4.6 Article

Apatinib-loaded nanoparticles inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis in a model of melanoma

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.10.084

关键词

Apatinib; Nanoparticle; Melanoma; Angiogenesis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81701838]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M632628]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-angiogenic drugs are an effective therapeutic method for the treatment of melanomas. Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which has potent inhibitory activity on tumor angiogenesis. Due to the low water solubility and stability of Apatinib, we aimed to design and develop poly (lactic-coglycolic acid) (PLGA) and Poloxamer 407 nanoparticles to encapsulate Apatinib (Apa/p NPs) to improve the efficacy of application in melanoma treatment. The size and morphology of the nanoparticles were characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In vitro proliferation assays were used to assess the capacity of Apa/p NPs to suppress the growth of B16 cells. Furthermore, we constructed melanoma models using C57BL/6 mice, and preliminary evaluation of the effect and mechanism of Apa/p NPs on tumor inhibition was performed in vivo. The results showed that the size of Apa/p NPs averaged 136 +/- 0.27 nm and the nanoparticles were evenly dispersed. Moreover, Apa/p NPs significantly inhibited the growth of B16 cells and melanoma tumors, compared with the naked drug treatment and control groups. The protein levels of VEGFR-2, phosphorylated (p)-VEGFR-2 and p-ERK1/2 in tumor tissues were inhibited by Apa/p NP treatment, as detected by Western blot. The results of this study suggested that Apa/p NPs could inhibit the growth of melanoma tumors by inhibiting the phosphorylation and expression of VEGFR-2 and downstream ERK1/2, providing a theoretical basis for the clinical application of Apatinib in the treatment of melanoma. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据