4.6 Article

Optogenetic inactivation of the entopeduncular nucleus improves forelimb akinesia in a Parkinson's disease model

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 386, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112551

关键词

Entopeduncular nucleus; Forelimb akinesia; Globus pallidus interna; Halorhodopsin; Optogenetic stimulation; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. Korea Health Industry Development Institute - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI16C2188]
  2. Asan Institute for Life Sciences from the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea [2018IP0805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We performed optogenetic inactivation of rats' entopeduncular nucleus (EP, homologous to primates' globus pallidus interna (GPi)) and investigated the therapeutic effect in a rat model of PD. 6-Hydroxydopamine (6 - OHDA)-induced hemiparkinsonian rats were injected with either a virus for halorhodopsin expression that is used to inactivate GABAergic neurons or a control virus injection and received optic fiber insertion. All the rats were illuminated by 590 nm of light. Each rat was then subjected to sequential sessions of stepping tests under controlled illumination patterns. The stepping WA is a reliable evaluation method for forelimb akinesia. The number of adjusting steps was significantly higher in experimental (optogene with reporter gene expression) (5Hz - 10ms: 15.7 +/- 1.9, 5Hz - 100ms: 16.0 +/- 1.8, continuous: 21.6 +/- 1.9) than control rats (reporter gene expression) (5Hz-10ms: 1.9 +/- 1.1, 5Hz-100ms: 2.6 +/- 1.0, continuous: 2.5 +/- 1.2) (p < 0.001). Continuous EP illumination showed a significantly higher improvement of forelimb akinesia than other illumination patterns (p < 0.01). Optogene expression in the GABAergic neurons of the EP was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Optogenetic inhibition of EP was effective to improve contralateral forelimb akinesia. However, further studies using prolonged illumination are needed to investigate the best illumination pattern for optogenetic stimulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据